Compute for humanity review3/22/2023 ![]() ![]() 4.3 The prior N distribution may make n very uninformative.4.2 Critique: Human extinction is distant, a posteriori.4.1 We are in the earliest 5%, a priori.3.2 SSSA: Sampling from observer-moments.2.1 Gott's formulation: 'vague prior' total population.Depending on the projection of the world population in the forthcoming centuries, estimates may vary, but the main point of the argument is that it is unlikely that more than 1.2 trillion humans will ever live. Assuming that the world population stabilizes at 10 billion and a life expectancy of 80 years, it can be estimated that the remaining 1140 billion humans will be born in 9120 years. If Leslie's figure is used, then 60 billion humans have been born so far, so it can be estimated that there is a 95% chance that the total number of humans N will be less than 20 × 60 billion = 1.2 trillion. ![]() If we know our absolute position n, this argument implies a 95% confidence upper bound for N obtained by rearranging n/ N > 0.05 to give N < 20 n. In other words, we could assume that we could be 95% certain that we would be within the last 95% of all the humans ever to be born. That is, for example, there is a 95% chance that f is in the interval (0.05, 1), that is f > 0.05. If the total number of humans who were born or will ever be born is denoted by N, then the Copernican principle suggests that any one human is equally likely (along with the other N − 1 humans) to find themselves at any position n of the total population N, so humans assume that our fractional position f = n/ N is uniformly distributed on the interval prior to learning our absolute position.į is uniformly distributed on (0, 1) even after learning the absolute position n. A more general form was given earlier in the Lindy effect, which proposes that for certain phenomena, the future life expectancy is proportional to (though not necessarily equal to) the current age and is based on a decreasing mortality rate over time. Similar principles of eschatology were proposed earlier by Heinz von Foerster, among others. Leslie and has since been independently discovered by J. The argument was subsequently championed by the philosopher John A. It was originally proposed by the astrophysicist Brandon Carter in 1983 and is consequently referred to as the Carter catastrophe. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |